Video Transmission System Types


TYPES
SMC-2008
OTHER#1
OTHER#2
OTHER#3
BOX to BOX
YES
YES
NO
NO
PC TO BOX
YES
NO
YES
NO
PC TO PC
NO
NO
NO
YES



1. BOX to BOX

In most cases, if location A uses a video transmitter box, and location B uses a video receiver box. Only one-way transmission can be accomplished from A to B. Another words, user can monitor from B to A.

SMC-2008 has the ability to transmit data both ways. It is a transceiver that transmits and receives data. So, it allows two-way monitoring that is from point-A to point-B or vice versa. It is easy to use, specially designed for easy adaptation of both PC and non-PC users.

(Pros and Cons of SMC-2008)
Pros:

  • Easy to use (good for all regular users, especially non-PC users.).
  • Easy to install.
  • Two-way monitoring (some don’t).
  • Can integrate with security system.
  • Able to integrate with control unit for remote controls.
  • Built-in modem (some don’t).
  • Economic compact size.

Cons:

  • First time buyers who do not use PC must purchase two boxes to be able to transmit and receive data.

2. PC to BOX

If location A uses a video transmitter box, and location B uses a video receiver box. Only one-way transmission can be accomplished from A to B. Another words, user can monitor from B to A.

SMC-2008 offers PC monitoring software that is free of charge (normally at a cost in the market). User can install the software to desktop PC or notebook and use it as a remote monitoring station. The results are astonishing for the PC users.

(Pros and Cons of SMC-2008)
Pros:

  • PC users can purchase one box, and use an existing PC as a receiver.
  • Can integrate with security system.
  • Able to integrate with control unit for remote controls.
  • Good for notebooks, users can use notebook as a mobile monitoring station.

Cons:

  • Must have PC/notebook.
  • Can not have two-way monitoring (A to B, B to A, or video conferencing between two ends. If needed, another box can be purchased.).


3. PC to PC

Both location A and location B use PCs as a transmitter or a receiver. There are two solutions to PC to PC; (1) supplier sells AV card and software kit to users; (2) supplier sells special designed PC (like DVRs, digital video recorders) and software to users.

Pros:

  • It is cheaper to use AV card and software kit.
  • It is good for PC experts to use AV cards or special designed PC.

Cons:

  • Not good for non-PC users.
  • The AV card plus software solution requires installation of AV card and software to PC.
  • Users need to have PC/notebook for viewing (receiving) PC.
  • Special designed PCs are expensive.
  • No two-way monitoring (A to B, B to A, or video conferencing between two ends).
  • The AV card plus software solution is not able to integrate with security system.
  • The AV card plus software solution is not able to integrate with control unit for remote controls.
  • It is hard to distinguish problems caused from computer.
  • Hard to get tech support from CCTV suppliers


Transmission Media

1. PSTN (like SMC-2008)

Pros:

  • Reliable and dependable connections.
  • Easy to access phone line from anywhere.

Cons:

  • Limited in bandwidth.
  • Stay within new and developed area.
  • Videoconference from two ends may be limited for the long distance. (But, most cases, there is no problem with one-way monitoring.)
  • Phone bill for long distance connections.


2. Internet

Pros:

  • No long distance phone bill.
  • Easy to access with monthly subscription from ISP (Internet Service Provider).

Cons:

  • Both ends/sites must subscribe from ISP.
  • Limited in bandwidth.
  • Internet traffic: This is not good for the situation needs immediate connection.
  • ISP server down: This is not good for the situation needs immediate connection.
  • IP address setup varies from city to city. This is inconvenient for travelers.
  • The place being monitored has to be on-line. This is not good for the on-line fee based on hours.
  • Possible attack from internet hackers.

3. ISDN

Pros:

  • Wider bandwidth provides faster speed than PSTN.

Cons:

  • Expensive installation fee and monthly fee.
  • Inconvenient for travelers.
  • Not good for moving.

4. DSL

Pros:

  • Widest bandwidth provides fastest speed. Faster speed provides better monitoring video quality.
  • Cheaper monthly fee than ISDN (at least in USA).

Cons:

  • Pay installation fee and monthly fee (could be expansive in some areas or countries.)
  • Limited areas.
  • inconvenient for travelers
  • Not good for moving


Basic Comparison between ARSS and Competitors

ARSS
Competitors (most)
*1
Box-Box and PC-Box solutions Either PC-Box or PC-PC type of solution.
2 Easy to install for the compact size of transmitting box SMC-2008. Not convenient for installing a large size of transmitting PC.
3 Two-way monitoring. One-way monitoring.
4 Dependable PSTN phone line version for the security market. May use non-dependable Internet surveillance.
5 Flexible combination of the ARSS devices based on exact needs. Limited applications

* See Video Transmission System Types.


All rights reserved. Copyright Teklink Security Inc. 2001
Certain names, logos, designs, titles, words or phrases on these web pages may constitute trademarks, service marks, or trade names of Teklink Incorporated or other entities which may be registered in certain jurisdictions.